Waqf row: Centre opposes SC blanket stay on law with presumed validity

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Waqf row: Centre opposes SC blanket stay on law with presumed validity" has 981 words across 18 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 9 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Waqf row: Centre opposes SC blanket stay on law with presumed validity" was covered 11 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 320 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 3 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #28207447</li><li>URL: https://onderwijs.beamstart.com/news/waqf-row-centre-opposes-sc-17455839994113</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 11h ago

Waqf row: Centre opposes SC blanket stay on law with presumed validity - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

"While this court would examine these challenges when the cases are heard, a blanket stay (or a partial stay) without being aware of the adverse consequences of such an order in a generality of cases (even on members of the Muslim community itself) were the petitions to be unsuccessful, would be uncalled for, especially in the context of the presumption of validity of such laws," it argued.

In a preliminary 1,332-page affidavit, the Centre urged the top court to dismiss the pleas challenging the validity of Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, pointing out a "mischevious false narrative" surrounding certain provisions.

The Centre on Friday defended the amended Waqf Act in the Supreme Court and opposed any "blanket stay" by the court on a "law having presumption of constitutionality passed by Parliament".